| Pages: [1] |
1. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Farr Arrow wrote: I DEFINITELY do not like gates being able to be locked down long term without a player presence. I sure hope this type of activity never ever ever becomes part of the Eve universe. Can you explain, what prevents you from sh...
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2017.02.03 14:26:23
|
2. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Foggy Hedgehog wrote: It will be great, if shuttles and blockade runners will be nullified too Do not give blocade runner nullification. They already warp as fast as intercepters, align out like a frigate and can warp cloa...
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2017.02.03 13:28:07
|
3. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It will be great, if shuttles and blockade runners will be nullified too (but ceptors and t3c will not). It will make travelling easier, but it will make hauling of low volume expensive stuff harder. I know about insta-warp ceptors, but it is dumb...
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2017.02.03 09:58:32
|
4. Limited android client - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Donnachadh wrote: Foggy Hedgehog wrote: Donnachadh wrote: NO - because I want CCP to use whatever dev time they have available to make the game better for ALL us, see Rivr's post above about Windows Phone and then add Apple iOS to the lis...
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2016.03.12 15:15:09
|
5. Limited android client - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Admiral Icarus Raidriar wrote: If there was a client on Apple and Microsoft devices as well, I wouldn't mind. shure
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2016.03.09 15:59:20
|
6. Limited android client - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Foggy Hedgehog wrote: Anhenka wrote: Foggy Hedgehog wrote: Limited android client for trade orders and contracts management, science and industry job management, PI management (PI interface is very comfortable fo...
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2016.03.09 15:55:53
|
7. Limited android client - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Donnachadh wrote: NO - because I want CCP to use whatever dev time they have available to make the game better for ALL us, see Rivr's post above about Windows Phone and then add Apple iOS to the list. omg, LIMITED MOBILE CLIENT, ok?
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2016.03.09 15:54:03
|
8. Limited android client - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rivr Luzade wrote: So, I am not allowed to participate in that with my Windows Phone (soon W10M) device? Android users should have an advantage over other platforms/operating systems? Please explain, why this segregation makes the game as a who...
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2016.03.09 15:52:42
|
9. Limited android client - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Anhenka wrote: Foggy Hedgehog wrote: Limited android client for trade orders and contracts management, science and industry job management, PI management (PI interface is very comfortable for pads) etc. How about it? No, play the game to ...
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2016.03.08 21:48:25
|
10. Limited android client - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Anhenka wrote: Foggy Hedgehog wrote: Limited android client for trade orders and contracts management, science and industry job management, PI management (PI interface is very comfortable for pads) etc. How about it? No, play the game to ...
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2016.03.08 21:44:06
|
11. Limited android client - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Limited android client for trade orders and contracts management, science and industry job management, PI management (PI interface is very comfortable for pads) etc. How about it?
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2016.03.08 21:14:36
|
12. Sticky:CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Voting Phase - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Foggy Hedgehog, 30, 04, 08, 34, 14, 79, 61, 68, 01, 23, 42, 25, 82, 19, 80, 99, 59, 70, 67, 69, 47, 12, 66, 85, 52, 46, 81, 72, 88, 24
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2013.08.02 05:44:00
|
13. Singularity: Requests for account reactivation and unbanning - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Please reactivate Foggy Hedgehog
- by Foggy Hedgehog - at 2012.05.31 06:11:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |